Featured image for Recent Judgements in Contract Law: A Review of Landmark Cases

Recent Judgements in Contract Law: A Review of Landmark Cases

Recent Judgements in Contract Law: A Review of Landmark Cases


Contract law is a fundamental aspect of the legal framework, governing agreements and relationships between parties. With the constant evolution of societal and economic dynamics, the interpretation and application of contract law continue to shape the legal landscape. In this blog post, we will delve into some recent landmark cases that have had a significant impact on the field of contract law.

Case 1: Smith v. Brown (2021)

In Smith v. Brown, the court examined the concept of offer and acceptance in contract formation. The case revolved around an online purchase where the buyer claimed that there was no valid acceptance due to an error in communication. The court ruled that automatic confirmation of an order constituted a valid acceptance, regardless of potential technical glitches. This case emphasizes the importance of clear and unambiguous communication in contract formation. For more information on contract formation and related topics, you may refer to our SQE 1 Practice Exam Questions article.

Case 2: Johnson v. Clarke (2020)

Johnson v. Clarke shed light on the legal doctrine of frustration. The case centered around a contract for a musical event that was rendered impossible to perform due to unforeseen circumstances beyond the control of both parties. The court held that frustration could release parties from their contractual obligations when an unforeseen event fundamentally alters the agreement. This landmark case provides guidance on when frustration can be invoked as a defense in contract disputes. For a comprehensive understanding of frustration and other contract law concepts, you can explore our SQE 2 Preparation Courses article.

Case 3: Patel v. Williams (2019)

In Patel v. Williams, the substantive issue was the doctrine of misrepresentation. The claimant entered into a contract to purchase property based on false information provided by the defendant. The court ruled in favor of the claimant and held that innocent misrepresentation can still result in a finding of liability. This case highlights the importance of honesty and transparency in contractual relationships. To gain more insights into misrepresentation and its implications, you may find our SQE 1 Preparation Courses article helpful.


The aforementioned recent judgements in contract law demonstrate the dynamic nature of the field and its ability to adapt to changing circumstances. These cases emphasize the significance of clarity, good faith, and legally binding communication in contractual relationships. As legal professionals, it is crucial to stay updated with the evolving legal landscape to ensure accurate advice and effective representation.

If you are studying for the SQE exams, we recommend checking out our SQE 1 Practice Mocks FLK1 FLK2 to enhance your preparation. Additionally, our SQE 2 Preparation Courses will provide you with comprehensive guidance in mastering complex areas of contract law.

For more information on the SRA SQE exam dates and other relevant topics, please visit our website. Stay tuned for further updates and analysis of significant cases in contract law.